Consumer Reports for July 2007 has a review of several digital cameras. Frankly I'm disappointed. For instance… Their top rated compact camera is the Canon Powershot S2-IS. My daughter owns this camera. It's a great camera, but it was introduced in April 2005. The S-series has gone through the S2-IS and the S3-IS and the S5-IS has just been introduced. You can't even find a copy of their "top rated" camera on the shelf anywhere. The S3-IS is 8th on their list, being marked DOWN for image quality from the S2-IS. The G7 is 12th on the same list, ranking below both the A640 and A630. Somehow I simply don't believe the A630 is better than a G7.
In the subcompact class, their top choice is the Sony DSC-N2 (9 months old), but the second choice is the Canon SD430, which has been on the market for almost two years now.
I know it takes a while to test things properly, but what is the point in ranking digital cameras that have been out for almost two years?
(continued below)
And how did (my beloved) Nikon D200 score the BEST in image quality, battery life and ease of use – the only DSLR tested to score that well on the only three standards listed – come in fourth place??? In fact, it was the ONLY DSLR (out of 8 tested to score "Excellent" for image quality. The other 7 only managed "Very good." But, it's in 4th place…
Clavestone, you KNOW I know about the on-line review sites, but thanks. I was just putting this out there "for discussion" for the gang. You would HATE the article. Of 8 DSLR's, two were by Pentax — the K10D and K100D. I don't have the heart to tell you how they finished.
Actually, the final score was on a scale of 100. There were only 8 points between the top and bottom cameras.
Canon EOS 30D (74)
Nikon D80 (74)
Sony A100K (73)
Nikon D200 (71)
Canon Rebel XTi (70)
Nikon D40 (70)
Pentax K10D (70)
Pentax K100D (68)
They said that the list is "in overall performance order."
I get a kick out of THIS comment, though:
"Other 10 MP alternative … the Canon Rebel XTi, the latest in the Rebel line and a fine performer, despite its lack of spot metering." They've been reading my answers! (haha)
Consumer Reports, as with any review type medium, is written by humans. As such they all have feelings towards or against things and some have already made their minds up before they even handle the product. I don't read Consumer Reports mainly because if I follow their guidelines I will more than likely spend alot more than I should. I understand that quality costs but come on, do I need something I dont use day to day to be that high quality, usually the middle of the road will do. On that point if I do use something day to day, my hand tools at work for example, I will have my own views that most likely wont match theirs. Your an accomplished photographer right? So you already can tell just by handling a camera at the store how good it should be.
Trust your gut, after all, you've never seen their gut and who knows what that looks like.